carrier vehicle types in carrier plans file or separate?

Description

Dear Johan, Kai,

Seems that right now carrier vehicle types can

either be defined in the carrier plans file

or be defined in a separate file.

I don't think that we want to support both execution paths. Do you have a preference?

(In terms of coding I don't think that it makes a difference. In terms of maintenance, it might be easier to have it in separate files, because one might be able to bump up the version of the plans file without having to bump up the version of the vehicleTypes file, and vice versa.)

Note that the carrier vehicles themselves will remain in the carrier plans file; I think that that would be too much of a change.

Thanks and best wishes

Kai
[Created via e-mail received from: "Nagel, Kai, Prof. Dr." <nagel@vsp.tu-berlin.de>]

Environment

None

Assignee

Johan W. Joubert

Reporter

Kai Nagel

Labels

None

Components

Priority

Major
Configure